Jerk-offs have a hard time in society. They already feel "exposed", and so in the quest for attention and popularity, they created their very own special blend called Objectum Sexuality. Sounds exotic, right? In truth, it's masturbation using objects with human attributes assigned to them, through the power of their own fevered imaginings. Have trouble talking to women without stalking them, or fondling them in public spaces like the fuckin' piece of shit that you are? No problem! Dress up your dildo like a mascot and call it "Harry"! No? Oh! You like "boy" objects and "girl" objects, henceforth I must refer to you as a Pansexual Polyamorous Bisexual Objectum Sexual. Seriously. That is exactly what one woman who is a regular on the media show-pony circuit wants you so desperately to believe about her, because she is the "most specialest" kid on the block, helmet not included for outdoor activities: http://abcnews.go.com/GMA/story?id=7283494.
She, like "Diaper Baby Boy" and "Obsessed Car Guy", have full-on public displays of anti-social affection with their objects of choice based on their imagined sexual relationships that take place mostly in their heads, because all of them were sexually molested and/or violently assaulted as young children, which they will tell you about in great detail as to the many reasons why they cannot ever love disgustingly fleshy human people. They've had many productive meetings with their therapists that allow them to talk openly about their intimacies! As funny as it is to poke fun as some chick who thinks the Berlin Wall is a "hot celebrity" (thus making a committed monogamous relationship with "him" difficult. I know! Even objects have commitment-based issues), she actually gets the German government to give her the keys to an old turret for their overnight "honeymoon", so that they can intimately "exchange energy" as husband and wife, thus publicly validating her feelings. Their lack of a true homospaien sexuality is rooted is utter and complete dysfunction: http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/man-who-sex-over-700-4435804
I lost it when she showed everyone in T.V. Land her handmade to:scale version of the Berlin Wall (naturally, she's also an "artist"), sitting upright in her bed at night waiting for her to come home, with a robe and ascot tied jauntily around its "neck". Really? People be desperate to get on t.v., yo. For her, it began as a stress response to media attention while she trained for the Olympics as some special white girl Japanese archer, which was not rare enough to get anyone's attention because Japan ended it's national policy of Isolationism many years ago, hence she rubbed herself with it and named it. Voila! Instant spotlight: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Erika_Eiffel
It's not that I don't want her or any other person with Special Needs not to have a sexual identity, nor do I question the integrity of a learned psychologist steering away a possibly psychopathic individual towards masturbation with creativity attached to it, I just have to wonder where it ends for them all. Do they ever get better? Just like the movie-version of Lars and his Real Girl sex toy, it saddens me that the thought of touching another living human being fills them with repugnance, instead of generating the biochemistry necessary for our most intimate relationships. I may really like that lamp I bought from some catalog, but will it ever really love me back? Of course not. You know it won't.
As much as I may like the charm of your over-indulged story about a new coffee-maker, it's not actually a friendly robot who beeps happily in response to you, like a human might. I know, because I am the type of designer and artist who makes objects: tools are made for humans to use, not love sexually. Just like imbuing "Wall-E" the Mars Rover robot with human characteristics will ultimately fail over time, so we are made to belong to one another. That's what we want for you. Trust me, I know. Keep taking those meds, tho'. We want you to be the best you possible. We want you to be a healthily thriving human.
 |
| http://www.objectum-sexuality.org/ |
In an interesting side note, it occurred to me after I wrote this piece that the English language (unlike modern Romance languages) does not place objects in the same category as humans, by wrongly assigning them as masculine or feminine. We have, simply put, "he", "she", or "it". "It" is assigned to inanimate objects that are made from inorganic material (like rocks), and organic matter that has not developed a consciousness, like plants. Certain objects have great ritual significance (like an old oak tree that has survived for many generations), becoming over time mythological symbols of home and lineage, but without a human to assign a gender to it, there is none present. It with this higher awareness about words, and a greater sense about the world, that we recognize and understand that objects do not have a deeper and/or greater significance than people.
It should also be noted that the English language is derived from Indo-European traditions (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_language), predating many of the pagan European societies from which Roman Catholicism sprang from, in a brilliant feat of cultural assimilation (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_and_Paganism), with some cultures placing a much bigger emphasis on objects as part of their worship. It may be part of the reason why some humans have retained an over-dramatic ability to wrongly place emphasis and affection on objects that they can control, as a response to life stresses (like children do with toys), as a lurking remnant of our primitive responses to an environment not yet understood, like continued fear-based responses to weather conditions on our planet.
In fields like "Cultural Anthropology", certain remote and isolated cultures (like those on the island of New Guinea), still have native peoples who use ritualized homosexuality during their childhood, with elaborate sexual rituals and older initiates who teach them to worship "male" phallic symbols, like the trees in their forest. It is only until the tree gods are placated in their masculinity do boys become young men who lay with women. From then on out, it is understood by both genders that their world is divided neatly into "his" and "her" objects, a confused but ancient response to nature. Obviously, there are plants and animals that reproduce sexually and asexually (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproduction), but this was something that primitive cultures did not yet understand fully.
You're welcome, human.
